Archive for June, 2011

IRS Sets Tax Filing Extension at 5 Months for Partnership, Estate and Trust Returns

Wednesday, June 29th, 2011

The Internal Revenue Service has issued final regulations shortening the automatic extension time period for partnership, trust and estate tax returns from six to five months, meaning the returns are due Sept. 15.

The final regulations in TD 9531 put in place a temporary change that was originally promulgated in July 2008.
Those temporary and proposed regulations reduced the automatic six-month extension of time to file to five months for certain pass-through entities, including most partnerships, estates, and certain trusts.

As these pass-through entities were previously allowed to obtain an automatic six-month extension of time to file certain returns under 2005 regulations, the Treasury Department and the IRS requested comments on whether, and how, a five-month extension of time to file for these pass-through entities might increase or reduce overall taxpayer burden. Approximately 70 comments were received in response to the notice of proposed rulemaking.

A public hearing was held on Jan. 13, 2009. Three speakers appeared at the public hearing and commented on the notice of proposed rulemaking.

Pass-through entities used to be entitled to an automatic three-month extension of the time to file certain returns by filing one form, and could also request a discretionary additional three-month extension of time to file by filing a second form. TD 9229 provided temporary regulations that simplified the extension process by allowing most taxpayers, including pass-through entities, to obtain a six-month automatic extension of time to file by filing one single form. In the 2008 final and temporary regulations, TD 9407, the Treasury Department and the IRS finalized rules granting an automatic six-month extension of time to file for non-pass-through entities and granting certain pass-through entities a five-month automatic extension of time to file certain returns. The five-month extension included in the 2008 final and temporary regulations for certain pass-through entities responded to comments received on the 2005 temporary regulations.

Commentators expressed concern that an automatic six-month extension for pass-through entities would unduly burden individual and corporate taxpayers with ownership interests in pass-through entities because individual and corporate taxpayers might not receive information returns from pass-through entities in sufficient time to complete their income tax returns in an accurate and timely manner.

Recognizing the inherent conflict between providing sufficient time for pass-through entities to prepare returns and ensuring that the owners and beneficiaries of pass-through entities timely receive information returns needed to file their own returns, the 2008 proposed and temporary regulations specifically requested comments on whether a shorter filing extension period for pass-through entities might increase or reduce overall taxpayer burden.

The IRS received approximately 70 comments.
Several commentators suggested that the Treasury Department and the IRS should consider changing the filing and extension due dates for individual and corporate tax returns rather than shortening the extension period for pass-through entities. For example, some commentators suggested moving the individual taxpayer return due date to April 30th, or allowing individuals and corporations a seven-month extension of time to file returns. Other commentators suggested moving up the filing date for partnership, trust, and estate taxpayers to March 15th, thereby allowing these entities a full six-month extension of time to file until September 15th so that individual taxpayers with ownership interests in the entities would receive information timely.

However, the IRS said these suggestions are not viable options for a regulation project because the due dates for filing tax returns are determined by statute. Section 6081 of the Tax Code provides that, except in the case of taxpayers who are abroad, the maximum extension of time to file a tax return cannot exceed six months. Accordingly, without legislative action, the Treasury Department and the IRS cannot change the due date for filing tax returns or increase the maximum extension of time to file a tax return for pass-through entities, individuals or corporations.

Although the comments with regard to shortening the automatic extension period for these pass-through entities varied as to time periods, the majority of commentators agreed that a less than six-month extension period for pass-through entities would generally reduce overall taxpayer burden by allowing taxpayers with ownership interests in pass-through entities to receive information in a more timely fashion vis-à-vis preparation of their own individual or corporate income tax returns. There was no clear consensus, however, regarding what the optimal period of extension would be for reducing taxpayer burden.

The Treasury Department and the IRS considered several extension periods for pass-through entities, including a four-month and a five-month extension period, when drafting the proposed and temporary regulations. The Treasury Department and the IRS ultimately decided upon a five-month automatic extension period for the proposed and temporary regulations. Many comments were received supporting the five-month extension period. Some commentators noted, however, that the five-month extension period would not alleviate the burden on corporate taxpayers with ownership interests in pass-through entities. These commentators expressed a concern that even a five-month extension period for these entities would, in most cases, simply align the extended due date for pass-through entities with the extended due date for corporate returns, resulting in the same delay of information to corporate owners of these entities. That delay, the commentators contend, would greatly increase the need for filing amended returns.

Commentators suggested shortening the automatic extension for these entities to less than five months. In opting for the five-month extension, the Treasury Department and the IRS recognize that some corporations with ownership interests in pass-through entities may continue to experience delayed receipt of information needed to complete their own corporate returns. The Treasury Department and the IRS, however, continue to believe that a five-month extension period reduces the overall burden on taxpayers and strikes the most reasonable balance for all affected taxpayers. The five-month extension period allows pass-through entities, including complex and tiered entities, an adequate time for preparation of the required pass-through returns and also ensures the timely and accurate dissemination of information to a large number of taxpayers who require that information for completion of their own income tax returns.

Electing large partnerships required to file Form 1065-B, “U.S. Return of Income for Electing Large Partnerships,” for any taxable year will be allowed an automatic six-month extension of time to file the return, however, because these pass-through entities are statutorily required to furnish Schedules K-1 by March 15, regardless of any extension of time to file the return.

Retirement Financial Plans

Tuesday, June 21st, 2011

When hearing about retirement plans, many clients tend to think about the most popular of the bunch: individual retirement accounts (IRAs), 401(k) s or the Roth IRAs.

While each of these certainly has its merits, one common belief is that business owners can’t put away all that much into these plans, which is generally true.

I actually attend spoke at a retirement home two weekends ago in Upper Marlboro, Maryland and retirees were shocked at where else they could have been saving for retirement, and the tax benefits that you can allow yourself under some plans.

Other plans do allow for greater contributions, and that’s where life for some people can get a bit more interesting.

In fact, some plans allow for contributions of up to $49,000, and that’s nothing to sneeze at. Some plans such as the ones below:

Plans covered:
• SEP IRAs
• SIMPLE IRAs
• 401(k)s
• Solo 401(k) / Individual-K
• Profit Sharing
• Money Purchase Pension
• Defined Benefit

Trends and Challenges of the Mobile CPA Come to Light

Tuesday, June 14th, 2011

Mobile tools and devices can no longer be ignored or seen as a top executive toy, as they have come to the forefront of the CPA profession and, specifically, firm CIO and decision-maker discussions, according to Marc Staut, national director of technology at Reznick Group.

Staut spoke to a full room of attendees Monday at the AICPA Practitioners Symposium and Tech + Conference in Las Vegas about the trends and challenges facing today’s increasingly mobile accountant, and offered advice on addressing them.

“Mobile computing is so critical to the way we do business we can no longer separate mobility from the way we are expected to get things done,” said Staut in a session simply entitled The Mobile CPA. “The way we leverage the cloud and mobile devices is not about what the IT team is doing or where things are going to be in the future. This is about how we use it today and what it can do for our firms now.”

Staut discussed the most popular devices used by today’s mobile workforce, stating that laptops have all but replaced the desktop computer as they are lighter and more powerful than their predecessors. He also noted that netbooks, while thought to be “dead or dying” a year ago, are still “very convenient” for use on the road. Later this week the Google-powered Chromebook will be released, he added.

Staut also focused on the challenge many CIOs are facing with the increase in the variety of mobile devices in a particular firm, whether it is a smart phone, BlackBerry, laptop or tablet.

“We are at a point where we cannot keep up with the stream of things coming into our offices,” he said. “There are more tools and versions all the time, and IT groups can’t always keep pace. In accounting firms, many CIOs are considering the idea of bring your own device, and the enterprise will support them as much as they can. This is starting with smartphones, then tablets and probably laptop computers as well.”

As to what today’s mobile CPA looks like, or should look like, according to Staut’s suggestions, the essential tools should include mobile broadband access, mobile monitors, scanners, file sharing apps (such as CaseWare), collaboration software, some form of networking device (such as a MiFi device), surge protectors and encrypted drives.

Staut also addressed many questions that firms are having about the use of tablets, iPads in particular.
“I don’t think tablets are going to replace computers anytime soon, but they are definitely a complement to them,” said Staut. “One area of thought is, is it time to think about including tablets out in the field? It can be a second monitor, a file-sharing device, and a paperless alternative on an engagement.”

Staut concluded the session, stating that the biggest challenges facing the mobile CPA are storage, accessibility and security.

-Accounting Today

Intuit Sees Slow Growth in Small Biz Employment

Wednesday, June 1st, 2011

Intuit’s monthly Small Business Employment Index, covering the period between April 24 and May 23, found that small business employment grew by 0.2 percent in May, equating to an annual growth rate of nearly 2.6 percent.

The index is based on figures from small businesses with fewer than 20 employees that use Intuit Online Payroll.
“The rate of small business job growth is the same as April’s,” said Susan Woodward, the economist who worked with Intuit to create the index. “But because compensation and hours dropped slightly, we can say the market for small business employment is a bit softer than last month.

However, in light of recent tumult in Japan, Greece, and right here at home, it’s a comfort that small business employment continues to improve at all.”

Based on the latest data, the employment growth rate for April was revised slightly down to 0.2 percent, equating to 45,000 jobs added for the month. Since the hiring trend began in October 2009, small businesses have created 685,000 jobs.

Small business hourly employees worked an average of 107.9 hours in May, making for a 24.9-hour workweek. This is a 0.13 percent decrease from the revised April figure of 108.1 hours.

“As small business employers react to economic pressures driven by such factors as rising gas prices and natural disasters, we see the job market soften,” Woodward said. “Employers cut back on employee hours when they have less work for people to do.”

Average monthly pay for all small business employees was $2,624 per month in May. This is a 0.14 percent decline compared to the April revised estimate of $2,628 per month. The equivalent annual wages would be about $31,500 per year, which is part-time work for many small business employees. Roughly 65 percent of small business employees are hourly, and only 27 percent of them worked more than 140 hours for the month in April.

“With small businesses assigning fewer hours to employees, average monthly pay declines too,” said Woodward. “Again, we see small businesses absorbing the shock of major events like natural disasters.”

The Intuit Index also breaks down employment by census divisions and states across the country.

“Job growth, although slow, continued in small businesses across most of the country in May,” said Nora Denzel, senior vice president and general manager of Intuit’s Employee Management Solutions division. “But the East South Central division, where severe flooding along the Mississippi River affected thousands of homes and businesses, showed job losses in May.”