Posts Tagged ‘enforcing’

Obama to Meet Congress on Tax and Debt Limit Deal

Wednesday, July 6th, 2011

President Barack Obama plans to meet with congressional leaders on Thursday to try to strike an agreement on raising the debt ceiling through a combination of spending cuts and revenue increases.

During a speech Tuesday, Obama acknowledged that some progress had been made in terms of agreements on spending cuts, but insisted that Republicans should agree to some tax changes as well.

“I believe we need a balanced approach,” he said Tuesday. “We need to take on spending in domestic programs, in defense programs, in entitlement programs, and we need to take on spending in the tax code—spending on certain tax breaks and deductions for the wealthiest of Americans. This will require both parties to get out of our comfort zones, and both parties to agree on real compromise.”

Obama rejected the idea that has been floated lately that he should settle for another short-term debt limit fix while negotiations continue over larger spending cuts. The Treasury Department has said the debt ceiling needs to be raised about $2.4 trillion above its current $14.3 trillion level to $16.7 trillion by August 2, or the federal government risks defaulting on some of its obligations.

“Now, I’ve heard reports that there may be some in Congress who want to do just enough to make sure that America avoids defaulting on our debt in the short term, but then wants to kick the can down the road when it comes to solving the larger problem of our deficit,” said Obama. “I don’t share that view. I don’t think the American people sent us here to avoid tough problems. That’s, in fact, what drives them nuts about Washington, when both parties simply take the path of least resistance. And I don’t want to do that here. I believe that right now we’ve got a unique opportunity to do something big—to tackle our deficit in a way that forces our government to live within its means, that puts our economy on a stronger footing for the future, and still allows us to invest in that future.”

Vice President Joe Biden had been leading the budget negotiations until House Majority Leader Eric Cantor, R-Va., and Sen. Jon Kyl, R-Ariz., broke off talks last month, citing an impasse over tax increases (see Cantor Backs out of White House Budget Talks, Citing Tax Impasse). The bipartisan negotiations reportedly led to agreements to $1.2 trillion in spending cuts, but Republicans have so far refused to go along with tax increases. Obama tried to pressure them last week in a contentious news conference in which he blamed Republican lawmakers for refusing to concede on giving up tax breaks for corporate jet owners, hedge fund managers, big oil companies, millionaires and billionaires (see Obama Prods Republicans on Tax Hikes).

He rejected invitations from Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ken., to meet with Republicans at the Capitol last week, but he took a more conciliatory tone in announcing the meeting scheduled for Thursday at the White House with congressional leaders. But Republicans have indicated that they still are not inclined to accept any tax increases, which reportedly include limitations on tax deductions by the wealthy.

“The legislation the President has asked for—which would increase taxes on small businesses and destroy more American jobs—cannot pass the House, as I have stated repeatedly,” said Speaker of the House John Boehner, R-Ohio. “The American people simply won’t stand for it. And their elected representatives in Congress won’t vote for it. I’m happy to discuss these issues at the White House, but such discussions will be fruitless until the President recognizes economic and legislative reality. Our focus should be on getting our economy back on track by making the spending reductions and structural reforms necessary to address our nation’s out-of-control debt. We can do so without raising taxes on America’s small business job-creators.”

McConnell said he would accept Obama’s invitation to meet at the White House, but would resist tax increases.
“I view Thursday’s meeting as an opportunity for the congressional leadership and the President to talk about what’s actually possible,” he said in a statement. “I view it as an opportunity to know whether or not the President will finally agree to a serious plan to reduce the deficit. Or if in the middle of a debt crisis, he’ll insist on more stimulus spending; whether in the middle of a jobs crisis, he’ll continue to insist on hundreds of billions in tax hikes that we know—and he has acknowledged—will kill jobs. Republicans in Congress believe that finding a way to reduce the deficit and prevent Medicare’s bankruptcy should be the goal. These discussions are not about rich and poor or an election, but they’re about making Washington take the hit and make some tough choices for a change—not the taxpayers and job creators.”

Meanwhile, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., has introduced legislation to increase taxes on the wealthy. “The rich are getting richer and the poor are getting poorer,” he said Tuesday. “And the middle class Democrats have worked to make stronger is disappearing. Middle-class families are struggling to make ends meet.

That is why I have brought to the floor legislation demanding millionaires and billionaires contribute their fair share to this crucial deficit reduction struggle. When Republicans talk about shared sacrifice, they mean the sacrifice should be shared by those who can least afford it. Democrats believe the sacrifice should be shared by the richest 1 percent as well. The others have all sacrificed too much already.”

IRS Sets Tax Filing Extension at 5 Months for Partnership, Estate and Trust Returns

Wednesday, June 29th, 2011

The Internal Revenue Service has issued final regulations shortening the automatic extension time period for partnership, trust and estate tax returns from six to five months, meaning the returns are due Sept. 15.

The final regulations in TD 9531 put in place a temporary change that was originally promulgated in July 2008.
Those temporary and proposed regulations reduced the automatic six-month extension of time to file to five months for certain pass-through entities, including most partnerships, estates, and certain trusts.

As these pass-through entities were previously allowed to obtain an automatic six-month extension of time to file certain returns under 2005 regulations, the Treasury Department and the IRS requested comments on whether, and how, a five-month extension of time to file for these pass-through entities might increase or reduce overall taxpayer burden. Approximately 70 comments were received in response to the notice of proposed rulemaking.

A public hearing was held on Jan. 13, 2009. Three speakers appeared at the public hearing and commented on the notice of proposed rulemaking.

Pass-through entities used to be entitled to an automatic three-month extension of the time to file certain returns by filing one form, and could also request a discretionary additional three-month extension of time to file by filing a second form. TD 9229 provided temporary regulations that simplified the extension process by allowing most taxpayers, including pass-through entities, to obtain a six-month automatic extension of time to file by filing one single form. In the 2008 final and temporary regulations, TD 9407, the Treasury Department and the IRS finalized rules granting an automatic six-month extension of time to file for non-pass-through entities and granting certain pass-through entities a five-month automatic extension of time to file certain returns. The five-month extension included in the 2008 final and temporary regulations for certain pass-through entities responded to comments received on the 2005 temporary regulations.

Commentators expressed concern that an automatic six-month extension for pass-through entities would unduly burden individual and corporate taxpayers with ownership interests in pass-through entities because individual and corporate taxpayers might not receive information returns from pass-through entities in sufficient time to complete their income tax returns in an accurate and timely manner.

Recognizing the inherent conflict between providing sufficient time for pass-through entities to prepare returns and ensuring that the owners and beneficiaries of pass-through entities timely receive information returns needed to file their own returns, the 2008 proposed and temporary regulations specifically requested comments on whether a shorter filing extension period for pass-through entities might increase or reduce overall taxpayer burden.

The IRS received approximately 70 comments.
Several commentators suggested that the Treasury Department and the IRS should consider changing the filing and extension due dates for individual and corporate tax returns rather than shortening the extension period for pass-through entities. For example, some commentators suggested moving the individual taxpayer return due date to April 30th, or allowing individuals and corporations a seven-month extension of time to file returns. Other commentators suggested moving up the filing date for partnership, trust, and estate taxpayers to March 15th, thereby allowing these entities a full six-month extension of time to file until September 15th so that individual taxpayers with ownership interests in the entities would receive information timely.

However, the IRS said these suggestions are not viable options for a regulation project because the due dates for filing tax returns are determined by statute. Section 6081 of the Tax Code provides that, except in the case of taxpayers who are abroad, the maximum extension of time to file a tax return cannot exceed six months. Accordingly, without legislative action, the Treasury Department and the IRS cannot change the due date for filing tax returns or increase the maximum extension of time to file a tax return for pass-through entities, individuals or corporations.

Although the comments with regard to shortening the automatic extension period for these pass-through entities varied as to time periods, the majority of commentators agreed that a less than six-month extension period for pass-through entities would generally reduce overall taxpayer burden by allowing taxpayers with ownership interests in pass-through entities to receive information in a more timely fashion vis-à-vis preparation of their own individual or corporate income tax returns. There was no clear consensus, however, regarding what the optimal period of extension would be for reducing taxpayer burden.

The Treasury Department and the IRS considered several extension periods for pass-through entities, including a four-month and a five-month extension period, when drafting the proposed and temporary regulations. The Treasury Department and the IRS ultimately decided upon a five-month automatic extension period for the proposed and temporary regulations. Many comments were received supporting the five-month extension period. Some commentators noted, however, that the five-month extension period would not alleviate the burden on corporate taxpayers with ownership interests in pass-through entities. These commentators expressed a concern that even a five-month extension period for these entities would, in most cases, simply align the extended due date for pass-through entities with the extended due date for corporate returns, resulting in the same delay of information to corporate owners of these entities. That delay, the commentators contend, would greatly increase the need for filing amended returns.

Commentators suggested shortening the automatic extension for these entities to less than five months. In opting for the five-month extension, the Treasury Department and the IRS recognize that some corporations with ownership interests in pass-through entities may continue to experience delayed receipt of information needed to complete their own corporate returns. The Treasury Department and the IRS, however, continue to believe that a five-month extension period reduces the overall burden on taxpayers and strikes the most reasonable balance for all affected taxpayers. The five-month extension period allows pass-through entities, including complex and tiered entities, an adequate time for preparation of the required pass-through returns and also ensures the timely and accurate dissemination of information to a large number of taxpayers who require that information for completion of their own income tax returns.

Electing large partnerships required to file Form 1065-B, “U.S. Return of Income for Electing Large Partnerships,” for any taxable year will be allowed an automatic six-month extension of time to file the return, however, because these pass-through entities are statutorily required to furnish Schedules K-1 by March 15, regardless of any extension of time to file the return.

Retirement Financial Plans

Tuesday, June 21st, 2011

When hearing about retirement plans, many clients tend to think about the most popular of the bunch: individual retirement accounts (IRAs), 401(k) s or the Roth IRAs.

While each of these certainly has its merits, one common belief is that business owners can’t put away all that much into these plans, which is generally true.

I actually attend spoke at a retirement home two weekends ago in Upper Marlboro, Maryland and retirees were shocked at where else they could have been saving for retirement, and the tax benefits that you can allow yourself under some plans.

Other plans do allow for greater contributions, and that’s where life for some people can get a bit more interesting.

In fact, some plans allow for contributions of up to $49,000, and that’s nothing to sneeze at. Some plans such as the ones below:

Plans covered:
• SEP IRAs
• SIMPLE IRAs
• 401(k)s
• Solo 401(k) / Individual-K
• Profit Sharing
• Money Purchase Pension
• Defined Benefit

Intuit Sees Slow Growth in Small Biz Employment

Wednesday, June 1st, 2011

Intuit’s monthly Small Business Employment Index, covering the period between April 24 and May 23, found that small business employment grew by 0.2 percent in May, equating to an annual growth rate of nearly 2.6 percent.

The index is based on figures from small businesses with fewer than 20 employees that use Intuit Online Payroll.
“The rate of small business job growth is the same as April’s,” said Susan Woodward, the economist who worked with Intuit to create the index. “But because compensation and hours dropped slightly, we can say the market for small business employment is a bit softer than last month.

However, in light of recent tumult in Japan, Greece, and right here at home, it’s a comfort that small business employment continues to improve at all.”

Based on the latest data, the employment growth rate for April was revised slightly down to 0.2 percent, equating to 45,000 jobs added for the month. Since the hiring trend began in October 2009, small businesses have created 685,000 jobs.

Small business hourly employees worked an average of 107.9 hours in May, making for a 24.9-hour workweek. This is a 0.13 percent decrease from the revised April figure of 108.1 hours.

“As small business employers react to economic pressures driven by such factors as rising gas prices and natural disasters, we see the job market soften,” Woodward said. “Employers cut back on employee hours when they have less work for people to do.”

Average monthly pay for all small business employees was $2,624 per month in May. This is a 0.14 percent decline compared to the April revised estimate of $2,628 per month. The equivalent annual wages would be about $31,500 per year, which is part-time work for many small business employees. Roughly 65 percent of small business employees are hourly, and only 27 percent of them worked more than 140 hours for the month in April.

“With small businesses assigning fewer hours to employees, average monthly pay declines too,” said Woodward. “Again, we see small businesses absorbing the shock of major events like natural disasters.”

The Intuit Index also breaks down employment by census divisions and states across the country.

“Job growth, although slow, continued in small businesses across most of the country in May,” said Nora Denzel, senior vice president and general manager of Intuit’s Employee Management Solutions division. “But the East South Central division, where severe flooding along the Mississippi River affected thousands of homes and businesses, showed job losses in May.”

IRS Showcases Small Business Tools

Wednesday, May 18th, 2011

To mark Small Business Week, the Internal Revenue Service is highlighting the tax benefits and resources available to small businesses this year.

The IRS is encouraging those who are self-employed or own a small business to take advantage of the tax benefits and learn about various IRS resources that can help them meet their federal tax obligations.

“When you’re running a business, you don’t need to be a tax expert, too. But you do need some basics to stay tax compliant so your business can thrive,” said IRS Commissioner for the Small Business and Self-Employed Division Faris Fink in a statement. “There are many tax credits and deductions currently available. So now is a good time to learn about the tools and services the IRS offers.”

The Small Business Tax Center (www.irs.gov/smallbiz) has links to some of the most useful tools the IRS offers, including the Virtual Small Business Tax Workshop, a downloadable tax calendar, common forms and their instructions and help on everything from how to get an Employer Identification Number (EIN) online to how to engage with the IRS in the event of an audit.

The IRS is offering a free, 30-minute webinar called “Small Business Advantage” to show small business owners what’s available to them. The webinar is scheduled for Wednesday, May 18 at 2 p.m. ET. To register and watch, visit IRS.gov and type “webinars” into the search box.

The IRS also urged small businesses to take advantage of the tax-saving opportunities available when they file their 2011 returns. Two key provisions that business owners should consider are the small business health care tax credit and faster write-offs on certain capital expenditures.

The small business health care tax credit aims to help small employers provide health insurance coverage to their employees. It is specifically intended for those who employ low- and moderate-income workers. The credit is designed to encourage both small businesses and small tax-exempt organizations to offer health insurance coverage for the first time or maintain coverage they already have. More information about the credit is available on the Affordable Care Act page on IRS.gov.

Many small businesses that invest in new property and equipment can deduct most or all of these purchases on their 2011 returns. Normally, businesses recover capital investments through annual depreciation deductions spread over several years. But many small businesses can get these deductions sooner during 2011. Claim these tax benefits on Form 4562. Special rules and limitations apply. Details can be found in the instructions to Form 4562, Publication 946 and Revenue Procedure 2011-26.

Tax Prep Clients: Chain Stores and Web Services Are a FAILURE

Friday, May 13th, 2011

Tax filers who paid an accountant or CPA to prepare their returns register the highest satisfaction with their method of preparation.

Some 75 percent state that they were “very satisfied” in working with the accountant or CPA, according to a new survey.

In addition to the high satisfaction rates of those who used a CPA or accountant to prepare their returns, 77 percent of the filers who used an unpaid individual preparer (friend or family member) reported being extremely satisfied with the experience, according to MarketTools, a survey software company.

Satisfaction was lowest for individuals who visited a tax preparation chain to prepare their taxes, with only 64 percent reporting that they were extremely satisfied with this method, followed by those who used an online tax service (66 percent “extremely satisfied”) and those who used tax software (69 percent).

“Tax time can be an intense period for consumers, and it’s critical for companies that offer tax preparation software and services to listen to their customers to improve the overall customer experience,” said Justin Schuster, vice president of enterprise products at MarketTools, Inc.

The most popular means of preparing taxes is paying an individual such as an accountant or CPA to prepare the tax returns, or using a web-based (online) tax preparation service. Each of these methods was used by 28 percent of the filers.

Other methods of tax preparation were far less popular, including using tax software purchased in a store or downloaded (14 percent), visiting a branch office of a tax preparation chain (14 percent), completing IRS forms by hand (7 percent), and using a non-paid individual such as a friend or family member (5 percent).

IRS Begins Enforcing Tax Return Preparer Rules

Tuesday, April 26th, 2011

The Internal Revenue Service has begun taking steps to stop tax preparers with criminal tax convictions or permanent injunctions from preparing tax returns, sending letters to 19 tax preparers proposing to revoke their Preparer Tax Identification Numbers.

This is just one of several recent moves to improve the quality and oversight of the tax preparation industry. More than 700,000 tax preparers nationwide have registered with the IRS and obtained Preparer Tax Identification Numbers, or PTINs. This nine-digit number must be used by paid tax return preparers on all returns or claims for refund. Paid preparers must renew their PTINs annually to legally prepare tax returns.

“We owe it to all taxpayers and the many honest tax return preparers to remove the relatively small number of bad actors from the tax preparation industry,” IRS Commissioner Doug Shulman said in a statement Monday. “Just one unscrupulous tax return preparer can cause a lot of financial damage to both taxpayers and the tax system.”

By comparing the new PTINs with a database managed by the IRS’s Office of Professional Responsibility, the IRS was able to identify 19 tax preparers who applied for PTINs and either failed to disclose a criminal tax conviction or have been permanently enjoined from preparing tax returns. A permanent injunction is a court order used by the Department of Justice to stop a preparer who repeatedly prepares erroneous or fraudulent federal tax returns.

The IRS sent letters to all 19 individuals proposing revocation of their PTINs. Preparers facing revocation have 20 days to file a written response and provide supporting documentation as to why their PTIN should not be revoked.

With the end of the tax-filing season, the IRS also will initiate a review of tax returns that were prepared by a preparer who used an identifying number other than a PTIN, did not use any identifying number, or did not sign tax returns they prepared. The agency will send notices to those preparers who used improper identifying numbers. The IRS is also piloting methods to help identify returns that appear to be professionally prepared but are unsigned by the preparer.

“Hundreds of thousands of tax return preparers, the vast majority, play by the rules every filing season. The IRS is committed to ensuring they have a level playing field,” Shulman said. “Compliance with regulations that require the signing of a tax return by a paid preparer and use of the PTIN is central to our enforcement effort.”
The IRS is still registering approximately 2,000 preparers a week. Anyone who prepares for compensation all or substantially all of any federal return or claim for refund must register for a PTIN and pay a $64.25 annual fee.
The PTIN registration is the first step in a multi-year effort by the IRS to provide standards for and oversight of the tax preparation industry. Starting this fall, certain paid preparers will be required to pass a new competency test. The IRS will also conduct background checks on certain paid preparers. Additionally, expected to start in 2012, certain paid preparers must have 15 hours of continuing education annually.

CPAs, attorneys and enrolled agents are exempt from the competency testing and continuing education requirements because of similar professional standards already applicable to those groups. Supervised employees of these exempt groups also are generally exempt.

More information about paid tax return preparer requirements is available at www.IRS.gov/ptin.