Posts Tagged ‘Taxes’

IRS Flouted Procedures When Selling Seized Property

Tuesday, September 1st, 2015

Originally Published in ACCOUNTINGTODAY.COM

The Internal Revenue Service did not always follow its own procedures when selling some of the property it seized for unpaid taxes, according to a new report.

The report, from the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration, found that over the past four fiscal years from 2011 through 2014, the IRS has received approximately $114 million in proceeds from the sale of seized taxpayer assets. However, personal items were not always properly documented when they were returned, and personal information such as GPS navigation data and garage door opener settings weren’t always removed from the systems installed in seized vehicles, posing a potential security risk.

The IRS Restructuring and Reform Act of 1998 required the IRS to implement a consistent process for the sales of seized property in order to protect taxpayers whose property is being sold to satisfy delinquent debts. The IRS’s property appraisal and liquidation specialists are supposed to ensure that taxpayers’ rights are protected when property is seized for unpaid taxes.

TIGTA auditors attended six IRS auctions of seized assets and reviewed a sample of 44 seizure cases. The report found that for the cases they sampled, the seized assets in general were properly inventoried, safeguarded and handled professionally.

However, the written sale plans developed by the specialists provided varying amounts of detail for the actions to be performed on the date of the sale. More consistent and specific sale plans could improve managerial oversight and ensure consistent treatment of seized assets, TIGTA noted.

Personal items found in seized assets were not always properly documented when they were returned to taxpayers. In addition, TIGTA found there is no requirement for removing taxpayer information from installed systems in vehicles. Such information could present a security risk if a third-party purchaser gained access to it.

If procedures are not followed, there is an increased risk that the completed sales will not be in the taxpayers’ or the IRS’s best interest, TIGTA cautioned.

TIGTA also identified several strategies that the IRS should consider to potentially increase the number of bidders when selling seized assets.

“The IRS Restructuring and Reform Act of 1998 (RRA 98) requires the IRS to implement a consistent process for the sales of seized property,” said TIGTA Inspector General J. Russell George. “The IRS needs to fully comply with this provision of RRA 98.”

TIGTA recommended that the IRS require the property appraisal and liquidation specialists, or PALS, to consistently prepare a detailed sale plan once custody of the seized property has been accepted, and ensure that the return of all personal items from seized vehicles is documented.

The IRS should also require the PALS to follow requirements in the Internal Revenue Manual for conducting a sale adjournment and recalculating the minimum bid, as well as ensure that any adjustments are supported by the facts of the situation and properly documented, said the report. IRS employees should also take the necessary actions to remove taxpayers’ personally identifiable information from seized vehicles such as resetting any navigation, garage door and similar installed systems, according to TIGTA.

In response to the report, IRS officials agreed with seven of the nine recommendations and said it has hired a consulting team to improve its procedures.

“We have engaged a lean six sigma to review and evaluate all aspects of our seizure and sale program and present proposals for improving the program,” wrote Karen Schiller, commissioner of the IRS’s Small Business/Self-Employed Division. “Our goal is to further clarify our seizure and sales procedures while continuing to protect taxpayers’ rights.”

IRS officials disagreed with two recommendations to add guidance in the Internal Revenue Manual for indirect expenses of seizure sales that can be charged to the taxpayer and return of license plates from seized vehicles that are sold. Schiller pointed out that the IRM currently requires the return of personal items, which include license plates and documentation on Form 668-E if a taxpayer seeks personal items. She also pointed out that the manual and Treasury regulations already provide that the expenses allowed include the “actual expense incurred with the sale” in addition to expenses for the “protection and preservation of the property.” The expenses in TIGTA’s report related to expenses incurred at seizure sales for the safety and convenience of bidders.

TIGTA, however, maintains that the appropriate IRM sections should be updated to provide clear guidance for IRS managers and employees to follow.

Ten Things to Know about Identity Theft and Your Taxes

Wednesday, July 1st, 2015

Originally Published in IRS.GOV

Learning you are a victim of identity theft can be a stressful event. Identity theft is also a challenge to businesses, organizations and government agencies, including the IRS. Tax-related identity theft occurs when someone uses your stolen Social Security number to file a tax return claiming a fraudulent refund.

Many times, you may not be aware that someone has stolen your identity. The IRS may be the first to let you know you’re a victim of ID theft after you try to file your taxes.

The IRS combats tax-related identity theft with a strategy of prevention, detection and victim assistance. The IRS is making progress against this crime and it remains one of the agency’s highest priorities.

Here are ten things to know about ID Theft:

  1. Protect your Records.  Do not carry your Social Security card or other documents with your SSN on them. Only provide your SSN if it’s necessary and you know the person requesting it.Protect your personal information at home and protect your computers with anti-spam and anti-virus software. Routinely change passwords for Internet accounts.
  2. Don’t Fall for Scams.  The IRS will not call you to demand immediate payment, nor will it call about taxes owed without first mailing you a bill. Beware of threatening phone calls from someone claiming to be from the IRS. If you have no reason to believe you owe taxes, report the incident to the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration (TIGTA) at 1-800-366-4484.
  3. Report ID Theft to Law Enforcement.  If your SSN was compromised and you think you may be the victim of tax-related ID theft, file a police report. You can also file a report with the Federal Trade Commission using the FTC Complaint Assistant. It’s also important to contact one of the three credit bureaus so they can place a freeze on your account.
  4. Complete an IRS Form 14039 Identity Theft Affidavit.  Once you’ve filed a police report, file an IRS Form 14039 Identity Theft Affidavit.  Print the form and mail or fax it according to the instructions. Continue to pay your taxes and file your tax return, even if you must do so by paper.
  5. Understand IRS Notices.  Once the IRS verifies a taxpayer’s identity, the agency will mail a particular letter to the taxpayer. The notice says that the IRS is monitoring the taxpayer’s account. Some notices may contain a unique Identity Protection Personal Identification Number (IP PIN) for tax filing purposes.
  6. IP PINs.  If a taxpayer reports that they are a victim of ID theft or the IRS identifies a taxpayer as being a victim, they will be issued an IP PIN. The IP PIN is a unique six-digit number that a victim of ID theft uses to file a tax return. In 2014, the IRS launched an IP PIN Pilot program. The program offers residents of Florida, Georgia and Washington, D.C., the opportunity to apply for an IP PIN, due to high levels of tax-related identity theft there.
  7. Data Breaches.  If you learn about a data breach that may have compromised your personal information, keep in mind not every data breach results in identity theft.  Further, not every identity theft case involves taxes. Make sure you know what kind of information has been stolen so you can take the appropriate steps before contacting the IRS.
  8. Report Suspicious Activity.  If you suspect or know of an individual or business that is committing tax fraud, you can visit and follow the chart on How to Report Suspected Tax Fraud Activity.
  9. Combating ID Theft.  Over the past few years, nearly 2,000 people were convicted in connection with refund fraud related to identity theft. The average prison sentence for identity theft-related tax refund fraud grew to 43 months in 2014 from 38 months in 2013, with the longest sentence being 27 years.During 2014, the IRS stopped more than $15 billion of fraudulent refunds, including those related to identity theft.  Additionally, as the IRS improves its processing filters, the agency has also been able to halt more suspicious returns before they are processed. So far this year, new fraud filters stopped about 3 million suspicious returns for review, an increase of more than 700,000 from the year before.
  10. Service Options.  Information about tax-related identity theft is available online. We have a special section on devoted to identity theft and a phone number available for victims to obtain assistance.

For more on this Topic, see the Taxpayer Guide to Identity Theft.

Six Tips to Help You Pay Your Tax Bill this Summer

Tuesday, June 30th, 2015

Originally Published in IRS.GOV

If you get a tax bill from the IRS, don’t ignore it. The longer you wait the more interest and penalties you will have to pay. Here are six tips to help you pay your tax debt and avoid extra charges:

1. Reply promptly.  After tax season, the IRS typically sends out millions of notices. Read it carefully and follow the instructions. If you owe, the notice will tell you how much and give you a due date. You should respond to the notice promptly and pay the bill to avoid additional interest and penalties.

2. Pay online.  Using an IRS electronic payment method to pay your tax is quick, accurate and safe. You also get a record of your payment. Options for electronic payments include:

Direct Pay and EFTPS are free services. If you pay by credit or debit card, the payment processing company will charge a fee.

3. Apply online to make payments.  If you are not able to pay your tax in full, you may apply for an installment agreement. Most people and some small businesses can apply using the Online Payment Agreement Application on If you are not able to apply online, or you prefer to do so in writing, use Form 9465, Installment Agreement Request to apply. The best way to get the form is on You can download and print it at any time.

4. Check out a direct debit plan.  A direct debit installment agreement is the lower-cost hassle-free way to pay. The set-up fee is less than half of the fee for other plans. The direct debit fee is $52 instead of the regular fee of $120. With a direct debit plan, you pay automatically from your bank account on a day you set each month. There is no need for you to write a check and make a trip to the post office. There are no reminder notices from the IRS and no missed payments. For more see the Payment Plans, Installment Agreements page on

5. Pay by check or money order.  Make your check or money order payable to the U.S. Treasury. Be sure to include:

  • Your name, address and daytime phone number
  • Your Social Security number or employer ID number for business taxes
  • The tax period and related tax form, such as “2014 Form 1040”

Mail it to the address listed on your notice. Do not send cash in the mail.

6. Consider an Offer in Compromise.  With an Offer in Compromise, or OIC, you may be able to settle your tax debt with the IRS for less than the full amount you owe. An OIC may be an option if you are not able to pay your tax in full. It may also apply if full payment will create afinancial hardship. Not everyone qualifies, so you should explore all other ways to pay before submitting an OIC. To see if you may qualify and what a reasonable offer might be, use the IRS Offer in Compromise Pre-Qualifiertool.

Find out more about the IRS collection process on

Revenue Ruling 2015-13: 2016 Tax Deadline will be April 18 for Most Taxpayers

Wednesday, June 3rd, 2015

The Internal Revenue Service today issued guidance regarding the filing deadline for individual tax returns next year. The guidance clarifies the effect Emancipation Day and Patriots’ Day have on the filing deadline for individuals filing their returns in April 2016.

In most years, the filing deadline is April 15. In some years, the District of Columbia’s observation of Emancipation Day can affect the nation’s filing deadline (District of Columbia holidays impact tax deadlines in the same way that federal holidays do). Because Emancipation Day falls on Saturday, April 16, in 2016 it will be observed on Friday, April 15, which pushes the tax filing deadline to the next business day – Monday, April 18, 2016. Although most individual taxpayers will have until April 18, 2016 to file and pay their taxes, Patriots’ Day will be observed next year on Monday, April 18 in Maine and Massachusetts. This means individual taxpayers in Maine and Massachusetts will have until April 19, 2016 to file and pay their taxes.

Revenue Ruling 2015-13 will be published in Internal Revenue Bulletin 2015-22 on June 1, 2015.

Supreme Court: Maryland has been wrongly double-taxing residents who pay income tax to other states

Friday, May 22nd, 2015

Originally Published in The Washington Post

A divided Supreme Court ruled Monday that Maryland’s income tax law is unconstitutional because it does not provide a full tax credit to residents for income tax paid outside the state, a ruling likely to cost Maryland counties and localities across the country millions of dollars in revenue.

The court voted 5 to 4 to affirm a 2013 Maryland Court of Appeals ruling that the state’s practice of withholding a credit on the county segment of the state income tax wrongly exposes some residents with out-of-state income to double taxation. Justices said the provision violated the Constitution’s commerce clause because it might discourage individuals from doing business across state lines.

In most states, income from elsewhere is taxed both where the money is made and where tax­payers live. To guard against double taxation, states usually give residents a full credit for income taxes paid on out-of-state earnings.

Maryland residents are permitted to deduct income taxes paid to other states from what they pay in Maryland income tax. But the state did not allow the same deduction to be applied to a “piggyback” tax that is collected by the state for counties and the city of Baltimore.

The ruling affects about 55,000 Maryland taxpayers, according to the state comptroller’s office.

Those who tried to claim the credit on their county income tax returns between 2006 and 2014 are likely to be eligible for refunds, which officials estimate could total $200 million with interest.

Going forward, certain small-business owners who pay income taxes to another state on income earned in that state will be able to claim a credit for both the state and county portions of the Maryland tax, costing Maryland an estimated $42 million a year in revenue.

Montgomery County, which has the highest share of residents with out-of-state income, stands to be hardest hit. State officials estimate that the county is on the hook for about $115 million in refunds and interest, plus a loss of $24 million a year in tax revenue.

“I was hoping we would avoid this,” said County Executive Isiah Leggett (D), warning that the loss of revenue increases the likelihood of a major property tax increase next year. “This case cannot be overstated in terms of its significance.”

The ruling in Comptroller of the Treasury of Maryland v. Wynne also potentially affects thousands of other cities, counties and states with similar tax laws, including New York, Indiana, Pennsylvania and New York.

The case was brought by a Howard County couple, Brian and Karen Wynne, who reported $2.7 million in 2006 income, about half from their stake in Maxim Healthcare Services, a Columbia-based home-care and medical staffing company that does business in more than three dozen states.

The Wynnes paid $123,363 in Maryland state income tax and claimed an $84,550 Maryland credit for taxes paid in other states on income from Maxim.

Maryland taxes personal income at up to 5.75 percent. It also collects and distributes a piggyback income tax of up to 3.2 percent for each of the 23 counties and Baltimore City. But Maryland until now has offered no credit for the piggyback tax — in this case, the 3.2 percent the Wynnes owed to Howard County. The Wynnes and their attorneys contended that this represented about $25,000 in illegal double taxation.

The court was sharply divided, although not along the usual ideological lines. Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. wrote the opinion for a majority that comprised him, Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. and Justices Anthony M. Kennedy, Stephen G. Breyer and Sonia Soto­mayor.

Alito said the court has long recognized that the commerce clause has a “dormant” or underlying meaning. This holds that while the clause gives Congress the power to regulate commerce among the states, it also was intended to ensure that states would not pass laws to restrict interstate business.

Maryland’s tax law violates that implicit aspect of the commerce clause, Alito said.

State officials argued that under the due process clause of the Constitution, states have a historic right to tax the income of their residents, no matter where it is earned.

The piggyback segment is excluded from the tax credit, officials said, to ensure that all residents pay an equitable share for local government services such as schools and public safety.

But Alito said Maryland’s argument is flawed because states have long offered a similar credit for out-of-state taxes paid by corporations, who “also benefit heavily from state and local services.”

Alito called Maryland’s tax policy “inherently discriminatory,” saying it essentially operates as a tariff, or a tax designed to restrict trade.

Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Antonin Scalia, Elena Kagan and Clarence Thomas dissented, with Ginsburg, Scalia and Thomas writing separate opinions.

Ginsburg, writing the principal dissent, said there was nothing in the Constitution that compelled Maryland — or any other state — to change its laws because of taxes paid by its residents elsewhere. .

In his dissent, Scalia called the dormant commerce clause “a judge-invented rule under which judges may set aside state laws that they think impose too much of a burden upon interstate commerce.” Scalia said he agreed that such a view of the clause has a long history. “So it does, like many weeds,” he wrote. “But age alone does not make up for brazen invention.”

Brian Wynne, who now lives in Carroll County and no longer works for Maxim, declined to comment Monday.

Michelle Parker, a spokeswoman for Comptroller Peter Franchot (D), said in a statement Monday that the office will “work diligently and in a timely manner to comply with the decision and enforce Maryland law consistent with the decision of the Supreme Court.” Parker added that the office is already reviewing about 8,000 refund claims dating back tjo 2006.

Money for the refunds will come from the state’s income tax reserve fund. The state will recoup that money by reducing state income tax revenue sent to localities each quarter over a period of two years, starting in June 2016.

Maryland’s General Assembly last year lowered the interest rate that applies to refunds from past years in order to cushion the blow in case the Supreme Court ruled against the state. The interest rate was reduced from 13 percent to the average prime rate during fiscal 2015, or about 3 percent.

IRS Commissioner Predicts Miserable 2015 Tax Filing Season

Monday, December 22nd, 2014

Originally Posted on Forbes

Internal Revenue Service Commissioner John Koskinen warned that close to half the people trying to reach the IRS by phone might not get through during the upcoming 2015 tax filing season. “Phone service could plummet to 53%,” he told an audience of tax practitioners at the AICPA National Tax Conference in Washington, D.C. today. That would be down from an already unacceptable 72% during the 2014 filing season. The average hold time projection: 34 minutes! What’s to blame? Budget woes. “All we can do is try to maximize our services as well as we can; as well as we can is still going to be miserable. You really do get what you pay for,” he said.

Koskinen’s remarks followed National Taxpayer Advocate Nina Olson who was even gloomier:“The filing season is going to be the worst filing season since I’ve been the National Taxpayer Advocate {in 2001}; I’d love to be proved wrong, but I think it will rival the 1985 filing season when returns disappeared.”

There are five key factors at play – complicating the upcoming filing season (that’s when you file your 2014 tax return). The IRS agency budget is the number one challenge, Koskinen said. The House has voted to cut the IRS budget for 2015 by $341 million, and the Senate has proposed to increase it by $240 million—that would still be 7% below 2010 funding levels.

In the meantime, Congress keeps passing laws that the IRS has to implement, namely the Affordable Care Act (“ACA”) and the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (“FATCA”). For example, Koskinen said the IRS requested $430 million in 2014 from Congress to implement the ACA but got zero, forcing it to take money out of enforcement and taxpayer services budgets.

This will be the first filing season with two major provisions from the Affordable Care Act –the premium tax credit and the individual shared responsibility payment–on Form 1040. National Taxpayer Advocate Olson said she’s very concerned about the IRS receiving accurate information from the health exchanges. It won’t be the IRS’s fault, but taxpayers will likely put the blame on the IRS. Koskinen touted the web pages that the IRS has created to help explain the ACA tax provisions.

Olson expects that implementation of FATCA, which affects taxpayers with accounts overseas, will also cause trouble this filing season. A new withholding requirement will mean there will be an issue with taxpayers trying to get refunds back in a timely manner. “If they are overseas, who are they going to call? There is not toll free number,” Olson said.

Then there are the tax extenders, 50-plus laws whose fate is uncertain. Congress has vowed to vote on the future of these laws in the upcoming lame duck session. But Koskinen warns that if the uncertainty continues into December, it could delay the start of the filing season and delay tax refunds.

Another factor Koskinen ticked off complicating this year’s filing season will be that the IRS is implementing a voluntary oversight program for return preparers. He said he’s still pushing for a mandatory oversight program. In the meantime, there will be a page on the IRS web site with a database of qualified tax preparers, including unregulated preparers who chose to participate in voluntary education programs. Attorneys, CPAs and enrolled agents, who all have separate licensing requirements, will also be listed.

Is there any promising news? Taxpayers are flocking to the IRS’s Where’s My Tax Refund feature where you can click and track the progress of your federal refund. They’re also using IRS direct pay, a secure online option for making tax payments (I use it; it really is quick and easy).

In the future (“some years from now”) Koskinen evisions a complete online tax filing experience. Taxpayers would have an account online where you could log on securely, see documents the IRS has received on your behalf, see your previous filings, and if there is an issue with your return, the IRS would contact you immediately—not two or three years down the line. “It’s not illusory,” he inists, adding that once more activities are moved online, the agency could sustain itself without annual budget increases.

Obama Threatens Veto of Emerging Tax-Break Agreement in Congress

Tuesday, November 25th, 2014

Originally Published in ACCOUNTINGTODAY.COM

(Bloomberg) President Barack Obama would veto a tax-break agreement being negotiated in Congress by Senate Democrats and House Republicans.

“The president would veto the proposed deal because it would provide permanent tax breaks to help well-connected corporations while neglecting working families,” Jen Friedman, a White House spokeswoman, said in an e-mail today.

Lawmakers are nearing an agreement on extending U.S. tax breaks that lapsed at the end of 2013 and making others permanent. The proposal would add about $450 billion to the budget deficit over the next decade, said a Democratic aide.

A veto would require an override by two-thirds of lawmakers in the House and Senate, a high barrier for a deal that could draw opposition from some Democrats.

The biggest beneficiaries of the breaks would include corporations that conduct research, residents of states such as Washington and Texas that lack an income tax, and wind-energy producers concerned that their tax benefit would end all at once instead of being phased out. Tax breaks for low-income families that lapse at the end of 2017 wouldn’t be extended.

The tax break for corporate research, which would be expanded and made permanent, benefits companies including Intel Corp. and Johnson & Johnson. A benefit for small-business investments also would be locked in.

The plan would make permanent a provision allowing individuals to deduct state sales taxes, an issue important to Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid of Nevada. In that state 22 percent of tax filers take advantage of the break, the second- highest percentage in the U.S., according to the Pew Charitable Trusts.

Wind Energy
The production tax credit for wind energy would be phased out over several years, said the aide, who spoke on condition of anonymity because the package wasn’t yet public.

A tax break for mass-transit commuters would be permanently extended as would a tax credit for college tuition, the aide said. Those are items championed by Senator Charles Schumer of New York, the third-ranking Senate Democrat.

Other breaks that may be made permanent include incentives for landowners to donate conservation easements and for individuals to make charitable donations directly from tax- advantaged retirement accounts.

Dozens of other tax breaks that expired at the end of 2013 would be continued through 2015. Among those that have lapsed are a provision that lets home sellers exclude from income the forgiven debt from short sales, as well as accelerated depreciation for motorsports tracks.

Child Credit
After reports of an emerging agreement yesterday, the Obama administration issued a statement signaling that it opposed a package that doesn’t extend expansions of the child tax credit and earned income tax credit that lapse at the end of 2017.

“An extender package that makes permanent expiring business provisions without addressing tax credits for working families is the wrong approach, at the expense of middle-class families,” Treasury Secretary Jacob J. Lew said yesterday. “Any deal on tax extenders must ensure that the economic benefits are broadly shared.”

Congress returns on Dec. 1 to finish its post-election session, and lawmakers want to leave Washington by Dec. 11.

That time frame might make it difficult for Obama to veto any plan, especially because the Internal Revenue Service has warned that waiting could delay tax refunds next year.

If this proposal falls apart, House Republicans’ fallback plan is to extend the lapsed breaks through Dec. 31, 2014, Ways and Means Committee Chairman Dave Camp said yesterday.

That approach would require lawmakers to return to the issue next year, when Republicans will control the House and the Senate.

IRS Offers Rules on Hardship Exemptions from ACA Individual Mandate

Tuesday, November 25th, 2014

Originally Published in ACCOUNTINGTODAY.COM

The Internal Revenue Service has issued a notice, regulations and other guidance related to the Affordable Care Act, including information on getting a hardship exemption from the individual mandate for health insurance coverage.

Notice 2014-76 provides a list of the hardship exemptions that taxpayers can claim on a federal income tax return without obtaining a hardship exemption certification from the health insurance marketplace.

Under the Affordable Care Act, for each month beginning after Dec. 31, 2013, Section 5000A of the Tax Code requires individuals to either have minimum essential health coverage for themselves and any nonexempt family member whom the taxpayer can claim as a dependent, qualify for an exemption, or include an individual shared responsibility payment with their federal income tax return.

An individual is exempt from the requirements for a month if he or she has a hardship exemption certification issued by the health insurance marketplace certifying that the person has suffered a hardship affecting their ability to obtain minimum essential coverage that month.

The IRS simultaneously released Revenue Procedure 2014-62, which announces the indexed applicable percentage table for calculating an individual’s premium tax credit for taxable years beginning after 2015. The document also announces the indexed required contribution percentage for determining whether an individual is eligible for affordable employer-sponsored minimum essential coverage for plan years beginning after 2015.

The same Revenue Procedure cross-references the required contribution percentage, as determined under guidance issued by the Department of Health and Human Services, for determining whether an individual is eligible for an exemption from the individual shared responsibility payment because of a lack of affordable minimum essential coverage, beginning after 2015.

In addition, the IRS issued TD 9705, finalizing its regulations for minimum essential coverage and other rules regarding the individual shared responsibility payment, also known as the individual mandate.

Budget Cuts Hit IRS’s Ability to Collect Delinquent Taxes

Thursday, November 6th, 2014

Originally Published in ACCOUNTINGTODAY.COM

Years of budget cuts are having a negative impact on the ability of the Internal Revenue Service to collect delinquent taxes, according to a new government report.

The IRS’s Automated Collection System is responsible for answering incoming taxpayer calls and working the inventory of taxpayer delinquent accounts, the report from the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration noted. Since fiscal year 2010, the ACS workforce has declined by 39 percent due to attrition or reassignment, TIGTA found. Because those resources are needed to answer telephone calls, fewer resources are available to work on the inventory of past-due taxes.

This has contributed to unfavorable trends in several ACS business results, the report noted, including the amount of new inventory of cases of uncollected taxes outpacing closures of such cases; the inventory of delinquent tax cases taking longer to close; more cases being closed as uncollectible; fewer enforcement actions being taken; and more aged cases being transferred to a holding file queue that the IRS maintains of uncollected taxes.

In addition, the IRS has not established performance metrics to measure the effect that answering incoming calls has had on compliance business results, TIGTA pointed out. Capturing such data would allow ACS management to assess the impact of prioritizing call handling.

“IRS management should take steps to ensure that inventory routing and ACS resource capabilities are aligned with overall IRS tax administration priorities and their vision for the role of the ACS in the Collection enforcement strategy,” said TIGTA Inspector General J. Russell George in a statement.

TIGTA recommended that the IRS re-examine the ACS’s role in the collection workflow process, including inventory delivery to the ACS as well as case retention criteria, and align ACS resources accordingly. The IRS should also request a study to determine the impact of the policy change to not require Notice of Federal Tax Lien determinations on certain unpaid balances, according to TIGTA. The IRS should also establish performance metrics for ACS call handling data to measure the impact that answering taxpayer calls has on compliance business results, the report suggested.

IRS officials agreed with the recommendations and plan to take corrective actions. “We recognize the critical role ACS plays in our Collection program and, while it is our intent that ACS’s role not be diminished going forward, the current budget environment requires us to continually evaluate our programs and priorities in light of declining resources,” wrote Karen Schiller, commissioner of the IRS’s Wage & Investment Division, in response to the report. “To that end, the Wage & Investment and Small Business/Self-Employed Divisions are currently realigning our compliance programs. As part of this effort, we are creating a single Collection organization within the Small Business/Self-Employed Division. The executive lead of this new Collection organization will have end-to-end accountability for the Collection program and will be responsible for reducing redundancies in our Collection processes and improving taxpayer services while identifying emerging Collection issues. While we are continuing to develop the structure and the concept of operations for this new Collection organization, ACS will be a key component. And, as part of our work on the concept of operations for the new Collection organization, we will be reviewing our ACS program to determine whether the Collection responsibilities and authorities currently assigned to our ACS employees need to be enhanced. We are proud of ACS’s contributions to our Collection program and it is our intent that ACS’s role be enhanced going forward.”

In further response to the report, the IRS pointed out that budget cuts are havin g an impact on its ability to collect revenue and taxes. “This report dramatically illustrates the bottom-line impact that IRS budget reductions have on revenue collection and unpaid taxes,” the IRS said in a statement emailed to Accounting Today. “With the IRS funding down by $850 million since Fiscal 2010 and priority programs such as identity theft requiring more resources, staffing for Automated Collection System fell from 2,824 in 2010 to 1,730 in 2013. At the same time, the report notes that tax collection in this program fell by $400 million. This is a clear example that deep cuts to the IRS budget hurts tax collection and threatens the nation’s revenue collection.”

Senators Introduce Bill to Prevent Tax Refund Theft

Wednesday, August 6th, 2014

Originally Published in ACCOUNTINGTODAY.COM

Leaders of the Senate Finance Committee have introduced bipartisan legislation to improve protection for taxpayers against fraudulent tax refund claims made with stolen identities.

Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, ranking member of the Senate Finance Committee, and Ron Wyden, D-Ore., who chairs the Senate Finance Committee, introduced theTax Refund Theft Prevention Act of 2014, S. 2736, on Thursday.

The bill includes new assistance for taxpayers who have been victims of identity theft and requires the Internal Revenue Service to establish a new security feature that individuals can use to protect their tax return filings.

“Tax refund fraud is a one-two punch for taxpaying individuals,” Hatch said in a statement. “Millions of taxpayers’ identities are compromised, and all taxpayers have their tax dollars wasted. Our bill aims to address such fraud by enhancing the IRS’s capabilities in detecting fraud and by giving victims the assistance and safeguards they need to repair the damage done by tax theft criminals. In order to further deter this crime, we make tax refund fraud a specific category of a felony offense and enhance security features for filers. Hard-working American families deserve a government that protects both their tax dollars and their sensitive taxpayer information. I am pleased Chairman Wyden has joined me in this advancing this effort.”

“We have to better protect lawful taxpayers from this nightmare issue,” Wyden said. “Earlier this year, I made it clear that taxpayer consumer protection must be at the heart of improving the American tax system. This bill offers a comprehensive, commonsense solution to a growing problem that will help prevent fraud and also provide assistance to those who have been victimized. Senator Hatch and I remain committed to protecting the integrity of our tax system.”

Under the bill, businesses would be required to report both employee compensation and certain non-employee compensation to the government earlier in tax season. The change would improve the IRS’s ability to identify and prevent fraudulent refund claims.“We have to better protect lawful taxpayers from this nightmare issue,” Wyden said. “Earlier this year, I made it clear that taxpayer consumer protection must be at the heart of improving the American tax system. This bill offers a comprehensive, commonsense solution to a growing problem that will help prevent fraud and also provide assistance to those who have been victimized. Senator Hatch and I remain committed to protecting the integrity of our tax system.”

Paid tax preparers would be required to file individual income tax returns and most information returns electronically under the proposed legislation. In addition, the electronic filing requirement for preparers who file over 250 tax returns would be scaled back to 20 returns, over a three-year period, to improve the IRS’s ability to identify and prevent fraudulent refund claims.

The existing access that the Treasury Department has to the National Directory of New Hires database would be expanded for the purpose of identifying and preventing fraudulent tax filings and refund claims.

Victims of tax refund theft would be assigned a single contact person within the IRS for help with correcting their tax records and receiving their tax refunds.

Under the bill, the list of aggravated identity theft crimes that are classified as felonies would be expanded to include tax refund theft. Tax preparers would also face significant new penalties if they inappropriately disclosed taxpayer information in connection with an identity theft crime.Victims of tax refund theft would be assigned a single contact person within the IRS for help with correcting their tax records and receiving their tax refunds.

Individual taxpayers would be able to add password security to their tax filings under the legislation. If a tax return filer elected to add this security measure, then a valid tax return could not be filed without also using the correct password.

Under the bill, due diligence requirements imposed on tax preparers with respect to the Earned Income Tax Credit would be expanded to include a requirement that the preparer verify the tax filer’s identity. The senators’ office noted that many fraudulent returns falsely claim the EITC in order to generate a tax refund.

Under the proposed legislation, he IRS would be prohibited, with limited exceptions, from issuing multiple tax refunds to the same account or address. Annual tax statements received by employees for wages earned would be required to use a truncated Social Security number in order to protect the number from identity theft.